Talk:Thornax Stew

I don't think it's enough for an article. OsmiuMap - You have no new messages. 23:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

There are pages with WAY less text than this, but if you seriously feel that way then I goes we should have a vote (I love votes!) - Matoro 1  I HAVE NO PULSE!!! Wait... thats my foot!

For deletion

 * Delete. Poorly written, unconfirmed information, and would be better off integrated into Thornax. Tahnok84 14:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Against deletion

 * First, this isn't how you get a page deleted. Second, it exists, it's confirmed, and it's more of an article than some other articles we've got. Panaka  lego  (BP Ad min) 16:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments

 * Firstly, I agree with your (PL) point #2 and I actually pointed it out above and I would have voted against deletionm but the article itself actually doubts its existance. Secondly, I understand that cramming everyone's thoughts on a page's deletion will not delete the page I was going to delete it if it reached 3 votes in the for section before 3 in the against section. True its existance has been confirmed but its only appearance so far is in the game I think, and I don't think the game counts as a canon appearance. (I'm trying to not be biased... its hard!)- Matoro 1  I HAVE NO PULSE!!! Wait... thats my foot!!!