File talk:Earthprotector.jpg

Yeah, this thing is fake, for at least two reasons. One, "Protector Of Earth", two, why would they put the Ignika on a set in a year in which the "Legendary Kanohi Of Creation" is the mask taking centre-stage? Wraith are never ending......I will show you your destiny...' 00:30, September 25, 2014 (UTC)

Has it occurred to you that this could have possibly been created early in the set box development process and that the Ignika was a placeholder, considering that the Mask of Creation's CGI model may well not yet have been created at the time this image was made, or that the name "Protector" was changed to "Defender" later in the development process? Or perhaps, considering that every single set list we'd gotten had been translated to English from another language, and that "Protector" may have been mistranslated as "Defender", considering that the two words have the exact same meaning?

Now let's take a look at the evidence towards this thing not being a fake. Compare this set's image to the prior leaked images of the Defender of Earth. See any major incongruities? If anything, this is just a more detailed image of the previously leaked images, without the background or CGI touch-ups. On the note of the lack of background, that's even more evidence that this occurred very early in the set's packaging production process. So, how would someone have "faked" a more detailed image of a set that we'd only seen in very unclear detail before? Secondly, consider that this image contains more than one piece that had never yet been released in a LEGO set before. How could someone just "fake" that? Thirdly, ask yourself this: Who, besides an employee working under LEGO or a company working alongside LEGO, would have the time, money, and resources to create a CGI image of a set that has never been released before? I'd like to see you apply a little more logic before you reach a conclusion.  Shadow master    (Contribs)   23:14, September 25, 2014 (UTC)