User talk:ToaAuserv/Archive4

User talk:ToaAuserv/Archive1 User talk:ToaAuserv/Archive2 User talk:ToaAuserv/Archive3

OK, OK, it's archived, lol. ToaAuserv ? ...BPAdmin 19:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Ratings
I don't like ratings because, first, they're a bit unfair. You may find this false (because the admins are the people I'm targeting here), but it seems that the admins increase in point value much faster than normal editors. However, this is probably because you have an obligation to edit, unlike others, who can come and go and choose not to edit if they wish. Second, it is very hard to increase a person's rating. An excellent user still might have a rating of 0 when they should have a rating of about 12. Third, 20 is too high for the speed at which ratings increase. 10 is a more reasonable number. Four, a new registered user should immediately be bumped up to 1, just for logging in. A rating of 0, believe it or not, might repel some people.

Though my vote is still to get rid of the Point System, with revision it could be kept. Boss Giovanni 22:36, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

HOOOOLLLLDDD on! You're saying you made your own rankings from 0 to 15 just because the guy in charge wasn't keeping up? What you should've done (this is more even for non-admins) is appointed a more efficient guy to up the ratings and then continued to edit just as well as before. Hard work pays off! (my vote remains on no) Boss Giovanni 23:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm not calling you a bad admin or anything, so don't worry about it being your idea or not. (My vote is still NO :) Boss Giovanni 01:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)