Talk:Kra

To quote the article, "When used, it denoted that the object of its reference was associated with shadow and/or the Element of Shadow in particular; the prefix could also be incorporated into names"

There's your proof, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see the the word Kraata incorporates Kra- into it.

Additionally, the source given in the main article doesn't mention the Kraahkan, so if Kraata doesn't belong on the page, neither does the Kraahkan.

Bionicle Dude 16:41, March 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * The prefix "kra" was retroactively derived from the name Kraahkan, so it doesn't need a citation. When I say I want proof, I want you to go to GregF and and get the information from him. BioSector01 would approach this matter the same way; if you don't have official proof, then you have no proof at all. If you don't have any official proof, then you are just speculating, no matter how reasonable it might seem. I would also like to point out the BS01 doesn't list kraata as related to "Kra-". -- Bold  Clone  20:15, March 11, 2014 (UTC)

You didn't explain that, so you can see my point of view, can't you?

And I wasn't just referring to this as why Biosector01 is a better wiki, BS01 is far superior for numerous other reasons, but that's unrelated.

Bionicle Dude 20:25, March 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * I know it seems obvious; I placed the info up there myself a long time ago. However, I later removed the info because we had no official confirmation. This wiki is built on facts, and facts need to be confirmed. all we need is a confirmation from an official source that Kraata includes the prefix "Kra". -- Bold  Clone  20:30, March 11, 2014 (UTC)

Could you give me the source that states it was retroactively derived from Kraahkan? The GregF post that was the only source only stated that Kra- was the prefix for shadow. Bionicle Dude 20:35, March 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * The original source for the quote has since been lost, what with the reorganization of the forums over the last couple years. If you follow the reference, the BZP page lists a source, which cannot be accessed. The lost source is where the confirmation would have been. -- Bold  Clone  20:37, March 11, 2014 (UTC)

OK,that's what stemmed my confusion and the ensuing conflict. Bionicle Dude 20:43, March 11, 2014 (UTC)