Talk:Brutaka

broo-tah-kah vs. broo-tack-uh
According to the 2006 Titan commercial, Brutaka's name is pronouced broo-tack-uh, not broo-tah-kah. There's not much difference there.- L D 7 6 0 { Give a yell } 20:36, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Yeah. I call him Brute-a-ka though.Brute92 12:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Brute92

I may be late in sounding my opinion, but if i remember correctly, the guy in the commercial had a distinct british accent.-LeoLab 17:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Also, in Into the Darkness, Greg pronounced it Broo-tahk-uh. Mighty Me 20:22, 13 April 2008 (EDT)

Redemption?
I remember reading on BZP that Greg stAted that Brutaka won't turn back, b/c he doesn't like when good characters suddelny become bad or vice versa. I know that he did, it is just an odd thing. -LeoLab 17:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Greg's wierd that way, he also stated that Lesovikk wasn't the leader of his team, and then he changed his mind. - Panakalego 18:21, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Makuta??

Makuta Brutaka does have a nice ring to it.Toafan13 15:29, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Since he's a Makuta, that means that he doesn't have to wear his helmet now.Toafan13 22:30, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

RANDOMNESS ALERT!!!
Where did the whole "Makuta" thing come from? I don't know anyone who thinks that, and what's the point of a theory in a Wiki page, anyways? Doesn't the guide say not to post theories on a page?

Akaku94 23:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)Well if you have a source you can--Toa of mind 23:37, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, it's pretty notable I'd think. Also, it's under Trivia so it's not really part of the main article. OsmiuMap 23:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

However, it should be noted that a theory in itself (and based off of one tiny fact!) is not a reason to be included in a page...

CuL8r!!! - Akaku94, Mask of Kopaka 23:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

And There is no source that I can think of...

CuL8r!!! - Akaku94, Mask of Kopaka 23:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Check out Bionicle story.com, he fell into the pool of stuff that made Makutas, then he became one or he may have already been one, either way he's a Makuta!Toafan13 03:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * He is not a Makuta. He just happens to now have Makuta powers. Racht  04:18, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Which, in my opinion, is just as random. >_< Panaka  lego  07:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * HE-IS-A-MA-KU-TA!!!!!! (take that Racht!)Toafan13 21:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Just ask GregF, and if he doesn't answer, then just wait, you'll get the answer in a serial soon.(I hope. I think. I know .) Mata Nui http://www.wikia.com/skins/common/progress-wheel.gif

Sounds good to me.Toafan13 03:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I still say he isn't a Makuta. It's not like Greg to change a character like that. Panaka  lego  ( Ad min) 03:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Toafan13, Brutaka is not a Makuta. No matter how many exclamation points you use, he will not be a Makuta. ToaAuserv ? ...BPAdmin 01:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

ask greg, i'll take his word for it, no offense ToaAuserv.Toafan13 01:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

and i think it should be changed, panaka.(no offense)Toafan13 01:49, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, someone answer this, HOW did the Makuta substance change him?Toafan13 17:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Early Life
where did the entire "Scholar, warrior" thing come from?Is it sourced?--KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAANNNNN!!!!  http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/uncyclopedia/images/b/b6/Kirk.gif 02:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Muateted brutaka
Did anyone know about this? (look at the pictures) http://de.bionicle.wikia.com/wiki/Diskussion:Brutaka http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=3572165 --Pnuts26 18:47, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/bionicle/images/8/85/Mata_Nui_Signature1.pnghttp://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/bionicle/images/a/aa/Mata_Nui_Signature2.png 21:01, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, and I also knew that it was fake.

Yes, the images' existance has been known of for a while but whether or not it is canon has not been proven. You don't see any pictures of it on Brickshelf, Lego hasn't announced its official release. I think it's canon.

by the way: mutated Brutaka set
I just remembered something...

A few years ago I saw something in the store lookning like a Brutaka. It was different than the regular Brutaka, but I can't remember exactly how it looked like.

And then again, few days ago, Somewhere on the web I found a picture featuring a mutated Brutaka's box (on this link)

Does anyone think that there might actualy be a mutated Brutaka as a set form or is that picture just a fake? On the box on the picture it says that it's set number is 8899, but Lego Customer Service does not recognize the number as Brutaka.


 * That picture is a old and well-known fake. It is, however, a good fake, and it has fooled many people. -  M ata N ui     Talk  14:55, April 6, 2011 (UTC)