User blog comment:ToaAuserv/Please Read and Comment: To-Do List Following Reboot Announcement/@comment-4677076-20141010060622/@comment-46464-20141010073410

I really don't think it's that important to make it clear in the title of the article that it's not part of the original continuity. It seems like a good idea now when there's less than 20 articles for the new continuity, but say in three years the line is doing well, shows no sign of stopping any time soon and we now have several hundred articles and counting whose titles all end in "(Reboot)". That seems absurd to me. Ultimately it will be clear to anyone casually browsing the wiki which article is from which continuity. The only links between the old articles and new articles will be on pages for characters, objects, locations etc. in both continuities, and then the simple fact that those pages say "hey, here's the other continuity's version of this page" will prevent any confusion.

The main reason I'm adverse to (Reboot) is it essentially adopts the term "Reboot" as what we're calling the second continuity. It's all well and good to call it a reboot now, but if it's still running in five years, calling it the reboot is going to sound weird, because it will be the well-established current story with 2001-2011 being something many of our members will only know about from the info on the wiki. BS01 is calling it Gen2, and as much as I don't like that term, it shows a lot more foresight than "Reboot." I still prefer simply calling it Bionicle 2015.